¡A su salud!: Effective for
Health Profession Students and Working Professionals
Evaluations of two separate pilot programs demonstrate the
learning effectiveness and participant satisfaction of the
intermediate ¡A su salud! program. Universally,
students and practicing health care professionals rated their
language and culture skills in patient-care
situations significantly improved.
Students also overwhelmingly agreed or strongly agreed that
the course was effective, enjoyable, well-paced and at the
correct level for learning. They found that the DVD, workbook,
faculty interaction, exams and grading methods all facilitated
their learning. Participants felt their ability to communicate
with and understand clients, establish trust, describe pain,
and ask and understand events that Spanish-speaking clients
experienced improved through the completion of this program.
Further, the students also reported that they had a better
understanding of culture's impact on communication in health
care settings.
For both pilot studies, learning performance data were gathered
on structures (grammar), vocabulary, listening comprehension,
speaking ability and an overall language performance measure.
Data are presented below on pre and post testing for both
studies. The data on the pilots is consistent with the evaluations
for the interdisciplinary health professions elective offered
each semester since fall 2004 at the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill.
Demonstration of learning efficacy: Winter 2001 (1st
pilot): One month long
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall score is a combination of structure, vocabulary,
and comprehension scores.
Demonstration of learning efficacy II: Summer 2003
(2nd pilot): Two months long
|
Test
Type |
Pre-test
scores +SEM: (n=40)
|
Pre-test
scores +SEM: (n=30)
|
Post-test
scores +SEM: (n=30)
|
Difference
in pre vs. post (n=30)
|
|
|
Listening
comprehension (total possible:10)***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary
(total possible:30)**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar
(total possible:28)**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
written test score (total possible:68)**** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking
skills (total possible:5.25)***** |
|
|
|
|
|
*The decreased value for the listening comprehension can
be explained by poor video quality of the post-test.
** (ns) = not significant
Hypothesized differences: ***= 10%,****= 25%, ***** = 20%
|